Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ipweaq.intersearch.com.au/ipweaqjspui/handle/1/5378
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHeldt, Tim-
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-05T00:22:22Z-
dc.date.available2019-11-05T00:22:22Z-
dc.date.copyright2019en_US
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.urihttp://ipweaq.intersearch.com.au/ipweaqjspui/handle/1/5378-
dc.description.abstractBridge and culvert management is transitioning from a maintenance management approach to an asset management approach. Both approaches are underpinned by Level 2 inspections. While technical aspects of bridge condition rating are described in bridge inspection manuals published by various jurisdictions, there is currently significant variability in the way that such inspections are undertaken. In this paper, accreditation of both bridge inspectors and agency business processes are proposed. The intention is that this paper form the basis for discussion, and if appropriate, the development of accreditation processes to improve bridge inspection, and consequently bridge management outcomes. Regardless of the status of transition from maintenance management to asset management for a particular organisation, improved assurance of Level 2 inspection data can enhance organisational outcomes.en_US
dc.publisherInstitute of Public Works Engineering Australasia Queenslanden_US
dc.subjectBridge Construction and Maintenanceen_US
dc.subjectRisk Managementen_US
dc.titleEnabling better bridge management by understanding risk by Tim Heldten_US
dc.typePaperen_US
Appears in Collections:2019 IPWEAQ Annual Conference, Brisbane (PAPERS)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat  
Tim Heldt Paper.pdf671.97 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in the Knowledge Centre are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.